00 Honestly, early ?

Updated September 2026×

Nothing here has been installed in an occupied home.

Companies at this stage usually describe what they intend to build in the present tense and hope nobody checks.

Exists today

  • Architecture, protocol and threat-model specifications
  • Executable software model, 181 tests passing
  • Capability-driven device model and action broker
  • Home graph with four state classes
  • Independent technical review, defects published

Does not exist yet

  • Production firmware, schematic or PCB
  • Manufactured prototype or enclosure
  • Installer and homeowner applications
  • Compliance plan or certification evidence
  • Occupied-home pilot data
  • A single cast element
C

Independent review outcome: a credible research prototype, not a product implementation. We think that is the correct grade.

P0Confirmation lifecycle bypass

The prototype issues a confirmation token, and possession of that token is enough to authorise the request again. The confirm step does not persist an approved state, which means the human-approval boundary we claim is not actually enforced.

The required lifecycle is issued → approved → consumed, with an authenticated approver, action hash, expiry, and an approval ceremony outside the requesting agent’s own channel.

P0Replay-window poisoning

Both the simulated gateway and device update the replay window before verifying the message authentication tag. A forged packet with a high counter can therefore suppress legitimate traffic even though it fails authentication — a denial of service on someone’s lights, without a key.

Cheap rejection of obviously old frames is fine. Unauthenticated input must never irreversibly mutate receive state.

P0Event origin ambiguity

Reconciliation reports and physical overrides both arrive with command ID zero, so a state correction can be mistaken for someone pressing a switch. Command ID overloading is being replaced with an explicit origin enumeration: local input, remote command, reconciliation, boot recovery, safety action.

Gates, not dates.

01What has to be true, in order

Foundation — three P0 defects fixed, reproducible build from a clean clone. Current.

Low-voltage proof — protocol on development boards, with latency, reconnect and coexistence measured on safety-extra-low-voltage loads.

Test pour — one cast element with conduit, box and draw-wire surviving demoulding.

Engineering prototype — one switchboard architecture, reviewed by a qualified electrical specialist before schematic freeze.

Instrumented pilots — devices running multi-day in real properties with traceable outcomes.

First building — one completed, occupied structure using the element and the system.

Repeatability — element library and configurator, and a project delivered by someone other than the founder.

02Deliberately not doing

Designing the full product family in parallel. Ordering production tooling. Marketing predictive fault detection we cannot yet demonstrate. Freezing the proprietary protocol before measurement. Letting agents take consequential actions. Treating the simulator as RF or thermal evidence. Owning a precast plant. International expansion.

Every item is a good idea that would slow the only thing that matters right now, which is getting one system working in one building.